DID 2012 MAYA CALENDAR'S LONG-COUNT END DATE USHER IN AN EPOCH OF CHANGE?

 

Scribe on Maya plate

Have we entered a new epoch that began in 2012? You may recall the 2012 Maya calendar kerfuffle. First off, the media got it wrong. The Maya never predicted the world would end on the last day of their thirteenth baktun in the Maya Long Count cycle. But Maya elders did say we were in for a time of transition. Is that transition now?

As a Mayaphile and student of Maya culture, I wrote Maya 2012 Revealed: Demystifying the Prophecy, to quash false information about the supposed "end date" in their Long Count calendar, one of 28 in the time-obsessed Maya system, that was being dangled like a piece of fresh meat before a pack of hungry wolves. The calendar simply rolled over into a new cycle and they started counting anew.

Maya Calendar (Historyonthenet.com)

But old habits die hard and just over a year ago a ruckus erupted over a tweet that suggested the Maya 2012 end of the world prophecy was off by a good eight years. That catapulted said end date smack dab into the cross hairs of 2020 —what a year that ended up being. 

The prediction however was not made by an eminent Maya academic or even a calendar researcher, but by plant biologist and Fulbright scholar at University of Tennessee, Paolo Tagalogquin. His Twitter account has since been deleted.

With ongoing global events, that very possibility—the world ending—may have crossed your mind.  And for the beginning of "the end" to start in 2020? Well, we've lived through two years of continuous threat from a raging pandemic still not fully in check. Let it be said some of us may have considered that to be a precursor of things to come. But it looks like we're still standing.

END OF 13TH BAKTUN

To explain biologist Tagalogquin's reasoning, apparently he did a math re-do on the Julian calendar that dates back to 8 CE and was used until the Gregorian or Christian calendar came into being in 1752. After his calculations, he came up with this tweet: "Following the Julian calendar, we are technically in 2012. The number of days lost in a year due to the shift into the Gregorian calendar is 11 days. For 268 years using the Gregorian calendar (1752 - 2020) times 11 days equals 2,948 days / 365 (per year) equals eight years."

The subtext: I assume you have your affairs in order.

Dresden Codex providing clues to Maya calendars (NGS photo)

Back in 2012, some believed December 21, 2012, might be the end. The media blared non-stop that this was when the Maya Long Count calendar completed a 5, 125 year cycle known as the 13th baktun. The ancient Maya, an advanced culture of mathematicians (they invented zero) and naked eye astronomers, viewed this moment as consequential.

CALENDAR SHUFFLE

Why is this even important? If the Maya code had not been deciphered a few decades ago, we wouldn't even have known that an end date to the Long Count calendar existed.

In researching the Maya end date, I realized that converting both Julian and Gregorian calendars to the Maya calendar had been no easy task. Spanish speaking priests were used for the conversion and needed to interact with the Maya who had their own language. Not only was there room for error in language differences, but the Julian calendar had gone through several trial runs over the centuries as the world coped with a one-time-fits-all calendar system.

During the conversion, some countries used different calendar renditions simultaneously, and some time in the 1500s while trying to play catch-up, eleven days were lost in a single month. My overall impression: whoever had been relegated to configure dates from Julian to Gregorian to Maya had stared down an impossible undertaking. And furthermore, who was their fact checker?

RIGOBERTA MENCHÚ CHEN

As the end date blossomed into a full-on media phenomenon, I took a wider view of the "Maya prophecy" as it came to be known. Great change doesn't happen overnight and can span decades or even centuries, and as with all things Maya, the present is determined by the past. Everything repeats. Everything is a recurring pattern.

Rigoberta Menchú Tum, Nobel Laureate

In 2012 Nobel laureate and author Rigoberto Menchú Tum, a Ki'che' Maya from Guatemala who was forced to leave her country when her government disappeared thousands of indigenous Maya, said this, "There are a lot of people speaking for the Maya with little respect for the sacred Maya calendar or the culture.

TIME DOES NOT EXIST

"For us, the Maya, during this phase, time does not exist. Time is completely dispersed. It is 'disordered time,' when the greatest breakdown of humanity will occur, plagued by loneliness, stress and fear.

"The Maya elders say if we do not take right action today, one-quarter of the people of the earth will perish."

Tum said this in 2012. Flash forward to 2020—especially the "plagued by loneliness, stress and fear" part of her quote and we can cast her as a Cassandra-like figure in light of the Covid pandemic. And we can all agree that in the past several years numerous issues have caused hardship: floods, hurricanes, raging fires, wars, racial inequality and unwarranted deaths. The stark reality of all the above drives away any hope for a soon to be bright future.

A MOMENT OF CHAOS

Maya Renaissance film by PeaceJam

In a documentary film, 2012: The True Mayan Prophecy, Dawn Engle and Ivan Suvanjieff, film makers and founders of the non-profit PeaceJam, interviewed Maya elders along with Menchú Tum. In the interview, Menchú Tum said we're living in a moment of chaos, and though there is global disorder, 2012 would usher in a more balanced period, if only we allow it.

DISORDERED TIME

"A new time is drawing near so it is important to maintain the light shining in these days, and our personal and collective light," she said. "We are passing through a period of disordered time which began in 1992 and will last forty years. There are things that happened that are not merely caused by people. It is the age, the energy, the cosmos."

TRANSITION TAKES TIME

In the film, Menchú Tum references her spiritual advisors, Maria Faviana Chocoy Alva and Pedro Celestino Pac Noy, who state that apocalyptic predictions misrepresent the true meaning of the end of the Maya Long Count cycle known as the thirteenth baktun. Their position is that this would be a time of great transition.

Calendar cycle cogs (By DK)

Who cannot agree that this is a time of transition, said Menchú Tum. "For humanity, it is the darkest of times. Humanity is being called to a great respon-sibility, affected by our actions. We call them natural disasters but they are not natural. Much pain is already occurring."

Again, Menchú Tum's sagacious predictions are synonymous with what we are presently living with—the human pain endured by the Covid pandemic, the earth's pain due to our disconnect from Mother Nature, and the atrocities humans have unleashed on the planet. Time, as the Maya might say, will tell.

                         **************

If you enjoyed this post, check out my other works, Where the Sky is Born: Living in the Land of the Maya. It's available on Amazon with tales of expat life and living within 100 miles of four major pyramid sites. Also, check out my website at www.jeaninekitchel.com. Books one and two in my Mexico cartel trilogy, Wheels Up—A Novel of Drugs, Cartels and Survival, and Tulum Takedown, are available on Amazon where you can find my overview of the 2012 Maya calendar phenomenon, Maya 2012 Revealed—Demystifying the Prophecy. 

                      

FRIDA AND DIEGO'S CROSS-COUNTRY JOURNEY CREATED ART, CONTROVERSY AND FAME

Self-Portrait on the Borderline Between Mexico and the United States 1931

PART 2 

Frida Kahlo's travel to the United States began in San Francisco where she and husband Diego Rivera lived in 1930 and 1931. Rivera, the most famous artist in the world at the time, bigger even than Picasso, had been commissioned to paint two murals in the city. If ever there was a working vacation, this was it. On the project's completion, they traveled from the west coast briefly back to Mexico, and from there, caught a ship via Cuba to New York, the second leg of their stateside journey. Kahlo and Rivera were no doubt the most artistically involved couple the world has ever seen. Both fed off the other's imagination, work, and inspiration, dove-tailing their way into making art that revered their native land. 

During that time, scholars credit 23-year old Kahlo's creative breakthrough to an over abundance of input, not uncommon for an emerging artist in new surroundings. Her world had expanded and she was able to paint with other artists while experiencing the sights of San Francisco which she called "the city of the world." Her art also drew on a vast body of knowledge rooted in her Mexican upbringing, which she then synthesized with experiences she gained in California—a perfect storm for an emerging talent such as Kahlo.

NEW YORK, NEW YORK

Frida and Diego in New York, 1932

In New York they stayed at the Barbizon-Plaza on Central Park South, the first music-art residence center in the US, complete with art studios, only two blocks from the Museum of Modern Art (MoMA). Soon after they arrived they were swept up into the social lives of many prominent people. Everyone wanted to meet Diego Rivera and his wife Frida. Though Rivera was quite the social butterfly, Kahlo not so much.

Rivera would exhibit at MoMA and had also been commissioned by John D. Rockefeller's wife, Abby, to re-create a mural in their home titled Wall Street Banquet, which had featured Rockefeller, Henry Ford and J. P. Morgan. After consideration, Rivera declined as it was quite controversial, casting the scions of industry in a bad light.

CLASS STRUGGLE

In New York, Frida observed the huge disparity between the wealthy and the poor. At first she and Rivera, though surrounded by well-heeled patrons, kept "witnessing the horrible poverty and the millions of people who have no work, food, or home, who have no hope in this country of scumbag millionaires who greedily grab everything," she wrote her mother. 

New York City Out-of-Work Dock Workers 1932

They visited a homeless shelter where they saw people sleeping "like dogs in a pen," she wrote. With the Depression in its third year, grim reality had set in and Rivera was inspired to paint Frozen Assets, where bodies were placed in morgues hidden away beneath cranes of industry. They witnessed a multitude of encampments nicknamed "Hoover Valley" for the president.

HARLEM SHUFFLE

After Diego's lengthy workaholic days at MoMA, at night they gravitated to Harlem for the jazz clubs, speakeasies, and dance halls though Kahlo noticed disparity there, too. While the world teetered on economic collapse, shrewd Frida noted the white and middle class headed to Harlem where the main draw was dancing and drinking while "feeling superior in whites-only clubs featuring black entertainers," wrote Celia Stahr, author of Frida in America.

Outspoken Frida called it out. Women of color pleasing the masses. "Everything here is pure show but down deep it's all real shit.  By now I'm completely disappointed in the famous United States," she wrote her mother. She said near Central Park where they lived, it was beautiful with fancy shops and restaurants while the working class lived in areas reeking of garbage. New York, she said, presented a "new level of poverty."

FRIDA PAINTS

In New York she stewed about injustice and in a new painting, she encapsulated a world where everything was pure show, titled Window Display on a Street in Detroit (though she began the painting in New York, she finished it in Detroit, 1931). Meanwhile Rivera sweated out finishing his last murals for the MoMA exhibit with five Mexican-themed murals—Indian Warrior, Sugar Cane, Liberation of the Peon, Agrarian Leader Zapata, and The Uprising.

Window Display a Street in Detroit, Frida Kahlo

For the opening, Rivera had painted 23 murals, 56 oil paintings and would display 89 water colors, sketches, and drawings (some on borrow). In many ways, Rivera and Kahlo were the social conscience of the country they visited. They saw things from unblemished eyes and painted their truths. (Below: Agrarian Leader Zapata and Sugar Cane, by Diego Rivera for DIA, from www.diegorivera.org).

MEETING GEORGIA

At the MoMA opening, Kahlo met famous photographer Alfred Stieglitz, husband of rising star Georgia O'Keefe. In O'Keefe she saw a woman who mirrored her in many ways—a painter married to a successful artist twice her age, a lover of nature and Indian culture, and a sexually free being, wrote author Celia Stahr. It's well known that O'Keefe and Kahlo had a relationship, though neither of them spoke about it openly.

Georgia O'Keefe (by Alfred Stieglitz)

Meanwhile the world of fashion contributed to the blurring of distinctions between labels such as bi-sexual and New Woman. Both Frida and Georgia, said Stahr, utilized the androgynous look to defy stereotypical norms and to assert their own independence and power as artists. 

Though Kahlo and Rivera only spent six months in New York, it was a stepping stone for Kahlo. She made closer friends than in San Francisco, including getting re-acquainted with old friends from Mexico. During her last months in the city she made two drawings, both titled The Dream. They had a surrealistic quality that the art world took note of, and the second one turned out to be prophetic—it showed her being impregnated by Rivera's "seed." Later that month she discovered she was pregnant.

MOTOR CITY

The train to Detroit took 14 hours from New York, long enough to transition from the world's most vibrant city into the city of technology and manufacturing, and the midwest—a far cry from the hub of activity and style she had just left. But Detroit's train station, beautifully constructed in the Beaux Arts style, cheered Frida's heart. Upon entering Detroit proper, however, the couple was soon to find out the city, in the depths of the Depression, was 50 percent unemployed. Poverty in Detroit was worse than NYC. 

Michigan Central Station (Vintage Michigan)

The U.S. manufacturing capital proved to be more alien to Frida's Mexican heart than either San Francisco or New York. In a city of 1.5 million, only 15,000 were Hispanic. She'd never felt more alone. And they'd arrived shortly after a five thousand people protest in front of Ford Motor had ended in gunfire, killing four.

She'd entered a war zone. Poor, unemployed people, no jobs, no housing, as Ford had provided company housing for many of his workers. Not to mention the city was anti-Semitic and she had Jewish blood. She was in hell. Things were going from bad to worse. Plus she was pregnant, and with problems left over from the accident in her broken body, she didn't know if she could sustain a pregnancy. She considered abortion but was talked out of it. Eventually her Detroit obstetrician performed a C-section, but the child did not live.

BAD NEWS BACK HOME

Trouble however, was not yet done with her. Shortly after the disaster of losing the child, she learned her mother was desperately ill in Mexico and a last minute trip to see her had to be arranged. With Diego commissioned for murals to both Ford and the Detroit Institute of Art (DIA), he wouldn't be able to accompany her. Luckily artist/photographer Lucienne Bloch, Rivera's assistant and Frida's friend, said she'd go along. Tickets were booked for the daunting train ride and border crossing. They arrived September 9, nearly three days later in Mexico City, slowed by enormous flooding in Laredo. Her sisters met her at the station as her father was not in good condition either. 

Guillermo Kahlo and Matilde Calderón, Frida's mother

Frida's mother had breast cancer and died a day after an arduous surgery. Frida's entire family was beyond distraught. When she told her father about Matilde's death, "he was done for," said Lucienne Bloch.  Kahlo returned from Mexico six weeks later to a city she despised and to a husband she feared was having an affair with one of his benefactors. Getting back into a routine and finding a rhythm with Diego proved challenging, wrote Stahr. When she met mythologist Joseph Campbell years later, he would tell her she had embarked on the classic Hero's Journey: Bus accident, miscarriage, mother's death. After all this, she returned to Detroit a changed person.

Disgusted with everything, she demanded DIA allow her to have a studio at the museum. Being away from patrons and society matrons who wanted to only talk clothes and gossip, this would give her the freedom to concentrate on her art with no interruptions. Her painting, My Birth, was born at this time. It was a painting that allowed her to release her fears and was considered another breakthrough.

MURALS ON DISPLAY

Diego's hectic schedule proved successful. He completed 77 panels for the DIA's Garden Court in March 1933, though not without controversy regarding his Communist leanings, written about by a Time magazine reporter. Doubts failed quickly though as the DIA opened the courtyard to early onlookers for ten cents a ticket to preview the murals for themselves. In three days 13 thousand people paraded through and were thoroughly impressed. All malicious thoughts fell away, and Edsel Ford was quoted as saying, "I admire Rivera's spirit. I believe he was trying to express his ideas about the spirit of Detroit." 

Detroit Industry Mural Panel by Diego Rivera (photo Lucienne Bloch)

Shortly before the formal opening of the murals at the DIA, Frida and Diego left for New York. He had been given a prestigious commission by Rockefeller to paint at the RCA Building in the new Rockefeller Center. Both were on a high: Rivera for his Detroit murals and Frida happy as she'd completed five paintings while in Detroit. A working holiday indeed. 

FIERY CRUSADER OF THE PAINT BRUSH

On Rivera's arrival, New York Times reporter Anita Brenner called him, "the fiery crusader of the paint brush." He began his murals at RCA Building, titling them Man at the Crossroads. As Hitler was heating up in Germany, Rivera wanted to make the rich take notice with his mural. He planned to contrast a scene of fascist warfare on the upper left side of the wall to a May Day demonstration in Moscow on the right, featuring Leon Trotsky, the exiled Russian revolutionary who had played a major role in the new government of the Soviet Union before being ousted by Stalin when he came to power in the twenties. Lenin was also in the mural, and not as a bad guy. Rivera planned to paint great wealth alongside desperate poverty— beauty turning to ugliness. In his murals workers would hold signs that read, "Divided We Starve—United We Eat." 

Man at the Crossroads, by Diego Rivera

As art critics, reporters, and onlookers strode in to take a look, the impression began to take hold that Rivera had a political ideology in mind for his mural. Things reached a crescendo when in April a reporter from New York World Telegram checked in at RCA. He posted a story about the mural with this headline, "Rivera Paints Scenes of Communist Activity and John D. Rockefeller Foots the Bill.'' 

On May 4, days before the mural was to be presented, Rockefeller wrote Rivera a letter asking him to tone down the Communist influence in the painting. Rivera did not defer, and on May 9, police entered the building and were told to shut down the work if Rivera did not paint Lenin out of the mural. Rivera would not concede and was presented with a check for his work and ushered out of the building in his coveralls. The work was boarded up and the only known photographs of it were taken by Lucienne Bloch, photographer and Rivera's assistant.

RIVERA FIGHTS BACK

Fired up, Diego, Frida and their group of workers decided how to counter the RCA shutdown and suppression of his work. Diego would paint murals at three "Communist" schools in New York. The next day the book burnings took place in Germany to "cleanse the German spirit" and this brazen act overrode the brouhaha at RCA Center. Because of Rockefeller's decision to can the murals, Rivera lost the commission to paint at the Chicago World's Fair. He shifted his vitriol against Rockefeller to painting a mural at the New Workers School instead of at the three Communist schools as pay back. 

Because of Rockefeller's act, both Frida and Diego threw themselves into workers' rights protests and political issues for the summer months that year. Rivera, still angered by the brushoff from Rockefeller, wallowed in indecision on how to proceed. Back in Mexico, a mural for a medical school commission awaited him. To soothe his wounds, he'd resorted to an affair with a young sculptress, and didn't keep standard hours at the New School mural. His antics were causing trouble in his marriage and he knew it, plus money was running out. 

A CHAPTER ENDS

Self Portrait With a Necklace, by Frida Kahlo

Frida apparently worked well in adverse situations as she created two more important paintings in their last months in New York: My Dress Hangs Here and Self-Portrait With a Necklace. When they finally boarded the Oriente in New York harbor in December 1933 to return to Mexico, both hoped to restore some balance in their relationship. Stahr wrote Frida had no idea what the future would hold. On leaving Gringolandia, she realized during her time there she'd created her best art. She had gripes about the States and had suffered the trauma of double death in Detroit, but the U.S. was a place where her creative spirit broke through to new heights, allowing her genius to soar. 

In Mexico, things between Kahlo and Rivera would continue to heat up, but as for art, Frida was on her way. 

Quote from Kahlo: "Perhaps it is expected that I should lament how I have suffered living with a man like Diego. But I do not think the banks of a river suffer because they let the river flow, nor does the atom suffer for letting its energy escape."

If you enjoyed this post, check out my other works, Where the Sky is Born: Living in the Land of the Maya. It's available on Amazon with tales of expat life and living within 100 miles of four major pyramid sites. Also, check out my website at www.jeaninekitchel.com. Books one and two in my Mexico cartel trilogy, Wheels Up—A Novel of Drugs, Cartels and Survival, and Tulum Takedown, are available on Amazon where you can find my overview of the 2012 Maya calendar phenomenon, Maya 2012 Revealed—Demystifying the Prophecy.